Pied Piping and Crossover-Effects in German and Polish. Some Minimalist Consequences 1. Introduction. The starting point of the analysis are constructions in English e.g. : "many students read the book" "the book( ) many students read (t)". Movements to the initial position of the sentence are not permitted under the same conditions in German and in Polish: "viele Studenten lesen das Buch", "*das Buch( ) viele Studenten lesen (t)", "studenci czytaja ksiazke", "*ksiazke( )studenci czytaja(t). 2. Problem - analysis - argumentation. These constructions are analyzed in embedded clauses, whereby cyclic movements can be pointed to COMP and specCOMP: (specCOMP) (COMP) studenci czytaja (x) (x) lezy na biurku, (ksiazka) (ktora) studenci czytaja (t) (t) lezy na biurku. We can observe that the WH-movement from the base-generated position is not admissible over the local domain in Polish. The WH-phrase pied-pipes the remainder . These movements become transparent, if we consider the negation: *(wiersza) (ktory) studenci nie czytaja (t) Mickiewicz napisal (t) *(wiersza) (ktorego) studenci nie czytaja (t) Mickiewicz napisal (t) ??(wiersza) studenci nie czytaj± (ktory) Mickiewicz napisal (t) (wiersza) (ktory) Mickiewicz napisal (t) studenci nie czytaja (t). Some attempts at explanation of the infinitive constructions in German were already suggested (cf. Riemsdijk 1985): "Jetzt hat er sich endlich den Wagen [den zu kaufen] er sich schon lange vorgenommen hatte, leisten können". I will discuss both examples and solution attempts. 3. Conclusions. The discussion, which proceeds from the argument structure, TH allocation and movements to COMP is continued in the minimalist framework. The activity of the operations " Merge " "Agree " and " Move " is considered, in order to remain (in situ) with " Procrastinate " or to force " Last Resort ". References: Abraham (1995), Deutsche Syntax im Sprachenvergleich. Grundlegung einer typologischen Syntax des Deutschen. Tuebingen: Narr Abraham&Gelderen (1997), German: Syntactic Problems - Problematic Syntax. Niemeyer Chomsky, Noam (1995), The Minimalist Program. MIT Chomsky, Noam (1998), Minimalist Inquiries: the Framework. Unfinished Manuscript. Lipczuk&Mecner&Westphal (1999), Lexikon der modernen Linguistik. Szczecin: Albatros. Mecner, P (1999) Plädoyer für ein generatives Modell der Linguistik Polnisch & Deutsch. Überlegungen zum Minimalismus. In: Katny/Schatte: Das Deutsche von innen und von aussen. Ulrich Engel zum 70. Geburtstag. Poznan: UAM Riemsdijk, Henk van (1985) Zum Rattenfängereffekt bei Infinitiven in deutschen Relativsätzen, in: (Abraham 1985, 1991) Erklärende Syntax, Gunter Narr