name: Adam Przepiorkowski title: Predicative Case Agreement with Quantifier Phrases in Polish affiliation: Ohio State University and Polish Academy of Sciences Predicative Case Agreement with Quantifier Phrases in Polish In Polish, _predicative_ APs usually agree in case with the NP they are predicated of; in (1), the subject NP and the predicative AP are nominative, while in (2), the QP and the predicate are accusative. (2) reflects the fact that, in Polish, QPs in subject position are accusative (Franks 1995, Przepiorkowski 1996) and that they are headed by the quantifier (Saloni and Swidzinski 1985, Przepiorkowski 1996). What is unexpected and unanalyzed so far is the possibility of the adjectival predicate agreeing with the genitive NP dependent of the quantifier, cf. (3). In order to deal with (1)-(3) we propose to slightly extend the domain of case agreement: an XP agrees with a phrase YP if and only if either i) XP agrees with the head of YP, or ii) XP agrees with a specifier of YP, but only if this specifier bears the same index as the head of YP. This idea could be implemented in Minimalism by defining the feature checking configuration to be [specifier, head], as normally assumed, but also exceptionally [higher specifier, lower specifier] (of the same head), provided the lower specifier and the head are co-indexed. We substantiate this idea, first, by arguing that the genitive NP within a QP is a specifier rather then a complement. One reason for this position is that, when a QP occupies an oblique case position (dative, instrumental, etc.), the NP agrees with the quantifier, instead of being assigned the genitive case, cf. (4). As we show in the full paper, in Polish, such mixed `agreement / non-agreement' pattern is typical of specifiers. Second, we show that the index of the QP and, hence, the index of its Q head is the same as the index of the NP specifier. This is clear from the binding facts in (5)-(6). In (5), the anaphor _siebie_ is plural and masculine, just like the NP _facetow_. Although Polish anaphors do not inflect overtly, they agree with their emphatic modifiers (_sam-_), which do show number and gender overtly. Since the index of the anaphor is plural masculine, so must be the index of the subject QP. Similarly, in (6), both the NP and the anaphor (and, hence, also the QP) are plural feminine. Finally, we look at constructions similar to QPs in that they involve a head noun occurring with a genitive AP specifier in direct case positions, cf. (7), and with an agreeing specifier in oblique case positions, cf. (8). Interestingly, these constructions do not allow case optionality analogous to (2)-(3); here, the predicative modifier may agree with the head only, cf. (9). Also NP subjects with genitive possessives, arguably specifiers, do not show such an optionality. This difference between (2)-(3) vs. (9) and NPs with possessive specifiers is expected on the analysis which links the optionality of case agreement to the identity of indices: in (2)-(3), the QP has the same index as its NP specifier, while in (9) the AP specifier does not have an index at all (because adjectives do not bear indices) and, in case of genitive NP possessors, the possessor always bears a different index than the possessed. We provide a formalization of these ideas within Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and argue against some potential alternatives. (1) Janek jest mily. John-NOM is nice-NOM (2) Kilka drzew bylo wyrwane z ziemi. a few-ACC trees-GEN was torn-ACC from earth (3) Kilka drzew bylo wyrwanych z ziemi. a few-ACC trees-GEN was torn-GEN from earth (4) Pomagalem pieciu kobietom. helped-1SG five-DAT women-DAT (5) Pieciu facetow zobaczylo siebie samych w lustrze. five-ACC guys-GEN saw SELF EMPH-PL.MASC in mirror (6) Piec kobiet zobaczylo siebie same w lustrze. five-ACC women-GEN saw SELF EMPH-PL.FEM in mirror (7) Cos ciekawego przyszlo mi do glowy. something-NOM?/ACC? interesting-GEN came me-DAT to head `Something interesting occurred to me.' (8) Przysluchiwalem sie czemus ciekawemu. listened-1SG to REFL something-DAT interesting-DAT (9) Cos ciekawego bedzie mile widziane / *widzianego. something-NOM/ACC interesting-GEN will be nicely seen-ACC/*GEN `Something interesting will be well-received.'